Quote it, get it signed off, deliver it — a live portal for every customer’s code and cloud
Missions turns a codebase into a living portal your customers can watch — DNA grade, sorties, requirements and the recommendations from each conformance scan. It also closes the commercial loop: recommended work is priced into a shopping list the customer sees on their own portal, they approve the items they want, and the same portal then shows what was delivered — one shareable link from proposal to sign-off to proof of work. Use it for third-party development and cloud management alike: a self-verifying review loop runs autonomous checks and browser-confirms what actually shipped, database changes are rehearsed against a real database before they go out, and cloud cost and infrastructure savings are surfaced across the customer’s estate. Sell it to your customers and give each one their own instance for onboarding, code review and CR management, with AI-slop detection on incoming changes. They self-serve, or you run it alongside them.
Live mission board — grade, sorties, requirements and per-sortie progress
A priced shopping list — propose recommended work to the customer with costs and a total, before anything starts
Customer sign-off in the portal — they approve the items they want, recorded against the price they were shown
Only current advice is quoted — a recommendation we can no longer confirm is withheld rather than sold again
Recommendations surfaced from the DNA conformance scan
Cloud cost & infrastructure management — savings and waste surfaced across the estate
A self-verifying review loop — autonomous checks that browser-confirm what shipped
Automated database-change validation — rehearsed against a real database before it ships
A per-customer instance — one mission portal per client
Third-party code review, change-request management and AI-slop detection on incoming changes
Abandoned-branch recovery — every other tool counts branches by ancestry and OVERSTATES the problem, reporting work that already shipped by squash or cherry-pick as abandoned. We compare the PATCHES and give you three honest numbers: what is already in, what genuinely is not, and what is safe to delete today
A disposition for every branch, not a list — delete, merge, regenerate or investigate, each with its reason. A list of abandoned branches is a scare; knowing what to do with each one is an afternoon of work
Unmerged work is scanned for security too — a fix that was written and never landed, a half-finished dependency bump, or secrets sitting on a branch nobody watches because it was never merged or deleted
Self-serve for the customer, or collaborative with the tenant
Ancestry read: 59 abandoned branches carrying 177 unmerged commits. A stakeholder said, verbatim, "I'm freaking out about this."
Patch read on the same minute: 12 branches were ENTIRELY already applied (squash/rebase/cherry-pick), 47 held 152 genuinely unapplied commits. Same repo, opposite story.
We got the diagnosis wrong twice before reaching for `git cherry`. Two-thirds of the surviving branches conflicted — not because they were damaged, but because newer fixes touched the same lines. That is the repo defending itself, not evidence of rot.
Run it on your own repo. `git branch --no-merged origin/main | wc -l` is the ancestry scare; `for b in $(git branch --no-merged origin/main --format="%(refname:short)"); do git cherry origin/main "$b" | grep -c "^+"; done | awk '{s+=$1} END{print s}'` is the patch truth. The gap between the two IS the pitch.
Per-customer instance, billed monthly. Branch-recovery scans included; a paid engagement lands the recovered work.
Missions is powered by EmberNest — the same production platform behind every app in the ecosystem.